Hinter dem Schleier

Verrat

Verwünschung.

Mythos

Nachrüsten.

Enthüllung - Bringe Hinter dem Schleier in deiner Bedrohungszone ins Spiel, falls sich keine Kopie von Hinter dem Schleier in deiner Bedrohungszone befindet.

Erzwungen - Falls dein Deck keine Karten hat: Nimm 10 Schaden und lege Hinter dem Schleier ab.

Brian Valenzuela
Das Vermächtnis von Dunwich #84. Zauberei #4-6.
Hinter dem Schleier

FAQs

No faqs yet for this card.

Reviews

One od the worst drsigned cards in the game. Treachery cards that gice you no recourse to deal with them are a design flaw. The other issue is that for some xharacters this us trivial, while it is an almost guaranteed defeat for others.

Tilted Libra · 37
There are ways to deal. Cancel the card, let it trigger and cancel the damage, be hardcore and just take it, Alter Fate, or resign. Or just stop drawing cards. I think anyone can do at least one of these. — TheNameWasTaken · 3
I cant think of a single character who is definitively destroyed by this card. Patrice without tech (eg 1 copy of Quantum Flux) still has a very strong chance of pulling her Elder Sign which prevents her being decked out, and draw heavy characters like Wini or Seekers have full control over their draw power. This card has literally never killed me, and it’s not hard to tech against if you are worried about it. And in a game where losing a scenario is nowhere close to the end for your character, I cannot agree that it’s a design flaw. — StyxTBeuford · 13053
I would just point out that while draw-heavy investigators have full control of their draw power, it still potentially shuts down their play style. That being said, needing to choose / build your investigator to counter campaign specific stuff is certainly not unique to Dunwich. — Zinjanthropus · 231
Also just because you have counters In your deck doesn’t mean you have them available with this card. They might be discarded to other milling effects in dunwich... — Django · 5177
I think generally most draw reliant investigators are Seekers who generally are already really powerful without needing the absurd draw anyway. And the more draw heavy your deck is, the more reliably you can find the tech for this before it hits you. — StyxTBeuford · 13053
@StyxTBeauford: While I do agree about Seekers (and they could use deck searching instead of straight draw, anyway), I don't think that Winifred is very good if she can't draw through her deck (The draw is really what makes her so OP). Though I suppose she could Versatile for Quantum Flux pretty easily. — Zinjanthropus · 231
Since this is included with milling effects, it can easily kill any investigator. — Tilted Libra · 37
@StyxTBeuford Have you played Patrice much? You can eaily go a whole scenario without pulling her Elder Sign. And when the only recourse to something is a random chance, that isn't good design — Tilted Libra · 37
@Tilted Libra, Eucatastrophe does wonders for Patrice against this card. There are definitely ways to handle this. It just takes planning. — dapineaple · 1
Ive played Patrice tons, I almost always pull her elder sign before she decks out. If you build her to test a lot it’s really not a big risk. — StyxTBeuford · 13053
In Dunwich I play Patrice with her friend, Olive. They do well together, making avoiding bad stuff like that trivial. — chrome · 68
I think it's a very well designed card, especially at the point it was introduced. The game needed something to shake up the "gather clues, kill enemies, win" rut from the core box, and this card suddenly made the act of card drawing dangerous. The sheer anxiety this effect managed to produce, coupled with the Encounter cards that punish you by making you discard cards from your deck, created a completely new type of challenge as yet unseen ... and it pretty much set a trend of introducing new creative mechanics in each new scenario and exploring the design space in unexpected ways. — ratnip · 76
With Amanda, you cannot just "not draw" a card. And with 2 copies of beyond the veil in your area, and no way to counter them, you are pretty much finished. Sure, in a 4 player game you can find a way, but not in a solo game. — casey080 · 25
I saw my mistake, but cannot edit it. Yes, you can have only one of those bad boys... I guess I still have a chance. — casey080 · 25
the fact that you you tilt up to your name make me love this game more. Yes, this card is strong and actually stressed me out too but it just embrace the "fail forward" principle so I could accept it. balanced out other weak discard cards encounter card aswell. and yes resigning is always an last option and this card make it matter more =/ I played the Pete miling build which run out fast and whole Dunwich give me big counter. got a good challenge there — Pawley · 34

So here's my game state; I have Beyond the Veil in my threat area. One card left in my deck. Deny Existence in my hand (saving it for this exact treachery). I draw a card in upkeep, so Beyond the Veil triggers immediately and I use Deny Existence to prevent the 10 damage. Phew.

Unfortunately, your deck will only cycle when you would draw a card from an empty deck. So at this point, I still have an empty deck.

So what happens in the following mythos phase? I draw another Beyond the Veil, it goes into my threat area and immediately triggers. ...But wait! I have a Ward of Protection. PHEW!

But unfortunately Ward of Protection only cancels the revelation effect, so the "Surge" keyword still applies. Oh well, I can handle the subsequent surge card, I'm sure...

...

Beyond the Veil AGAIN! Are you kidding me?! Instant 10 damage, because at this point my deck is still empty. Never has Arkham Horror kicked me in the balls as hard as this. I took all the mitigation that could be reasonably expected for this card, and still I couldn't survive it. Not a particularly fun card to play around, but it sure is a memorable one.

snacc · 1031
You at that point are looking at better odds drawing a critical fail for your Mythos test and every test on your turn. So consider yourself lucky! — Zerogrim · 297
Congratulations, you've unlocked a secret achievement! — jdk5143 · 98
Yowch; that is a kick in the nards. If only you had taken a draw action earlier to force the re-shuffle during your draw step, when you were more in control. I mean, I would have done the same thing, I'm sure. — SGPrometheus · 856
how could a mere paper game kuck you this hard — Pawley · 34

This seems to be a contentious card, but in my opinion the worst part about the card is that it simply isn't fun or interesting. Many of the card milling mechanics in Dunwich don't have significant counterplay and it's easy to draw this at 10 cards left in your deck and just eat shit. Every other strong encounter card has something you can do to mitigate its effects, like passing a skill check. This is just really boring and doesn't make me excited to play Arkham Horror.

the_mllkman · 8
There are a fair few ways to deal with it at this point tbf. Anything that targets revelation effects (ward of protection, test of will), anything that cancels damage (deny existence, devil's luck), anything that discards from play (Otherworld codex, alter fate) all just stop it cold. Stuff that manipulates the encounter deck (First Watch, Scroll of Secrets) can point it at a less vulnerable investigator or use the other milling effects to reset your deck. And in most of the scenarios where it appears there's room for at least one investigator to resign to dodge its trauma and you usually have enough warning to do that. You Handle This One will get rid of it if you have a friend who can deal with it/doesn't mind it/has a bigger deck. And all the other milling things are pretty irrelevant if you can stop Beyond the Veil itself. So while it's a big card, I don't think it's *that* hard to stop, almost any anti-encounter event will do the job, most encounter and most of the encounter decks that it appears in are built around it as the main threat. I don't think it's a wholly successful experiment, but it does give TDL a distinctive mechanical identity, and my experience is that dealing with it successfully does feel fun and satisfying. — bee123 · 31
One more satisfying way to deal with it mitigate it's badness — NarkasisBroon · 13
If you use first watch, you handle this one, etc. You can put it on a player who already has a copy in their threat area. In which case it just surges — NarkasisBroon · 13
Of course you can do something to mitigate the effect, especially now years after the Dunwich Legacy came out: You can cancel the damage, counter the encounter card, soak the damage, avoid drawing the encounter card, remove the card with Alter Fate, reshuffle your discard pile into the deck with Quantum Flux, increase your deck size with Versatile, draw fewer cards (or draw enough cards to reshuffle your deck before you draw Beyond the Veil). I just played the Dunwich Legacy with Marie and Joe. Marie had Deny Existence and Joe was running enough soak and Delay the inevitable to mitigate the high amount of damage this card deals. There are so many ways to deal with this card. Actually this makes me excited to play Arkham, because I would be very bored if the game was only about passing skill checks and did not include curveballs like this. However, I have to admit though that I did not understand the flavor of this card at first. But now I think it relates to the story: "Through the Gates of the Silver Key" where Randolph Carter loses his body after transcending time and space. The entity who grants this ability and curse to him is strongly implied to be Yog Sothoth so it makes sense in context of the campaign. — PowLee · 15
You can also run ‘I‘ll see you in hell‘ or ‘ghastly revelation‘ to lean into it killing you. Just use those on your own terms before the veil kills you. As a seeker, the ghastly revelation will just give you a mental trauma which (usually) isn’t a big deal. And you can use them to set your team up for the win — Pixcalcis · 1
There is almost no recourse in the core set or dunwich set, which were the cards available at the time, and are still the only cards available for those just getting into the game, playing in order. — eskimoform · 108
But there was also hardly enough card draw available in that old card pool to churn through your deck enough to be a playstyle. — Death by Chocolate · 1492
I have a question about this card. if at some point I have to draw more cards than I have left in the deck, is the deck considered to have been empty at some point and the effect is applied or do I draw what is left as cards, take an horror and reshuffle the deck, re-draw the missing cards from my new reshuffled deck and then the deck is not considered empty so the effect of beyond the veil is ignored? — TinchO · 1
@TinchO You reshuffle your deck because you are trying to draw from an empty deck. BtV triggers when your deck is empty. Nice try though. :-) — Time4Tiddy · 251

This card is a perfect example of how a treachery can shape the entire campaign. Dunwich has many cards that force you to discard undrawn cards, and although this can normally be bad enough (especially if it pushes cards you need into the discard pile) this card makes it a punishing, deadly mechanic if not built for.

Anyone playing Dunwich needs to build their deck with this card specifically in mind. There are several counter options for it, though some investigators really have no counter and should not be picked for Dunwich because of that.

For All -Consider resigning if running low and this is up. It is better to fail the scenario than take trauma, most times. This card gives you plenty of warning that it is going to kill you.

Survivor (can deal with this card) -Devil's luck: Straight out cancels the card if you can't counter it by other means. -Alter Fate: Get rid of the card from yours/an investigator's play area.

Rogue (will probably die from it) -No easy counter. Either tank it, run versatile with Deny Existence (keep in mind the extra cards you pick for versatile should have draw on them or you're going to run into deck dilution easily), or dump points into Cheat Death.

Guardian (will probably eat this but be fine) -No easy counter, but can stack a ton of mitigation to take the hit (I've had worse, just straight out tanking it, etc). Also guardians tend to have slower draw and even with the forced discards the event probably won't trigger.

Seeker (no direct counter but can probably cancel this) -usually very squishy and can't survive the hit once it goes off and also cycle their deck fairly rapidly. They are definitely at a higher risk from this card. However with abilities like Forewarning they can cancel it. Many of them also have access to the mystic card pool, in which case Deny existence or Quantum Flux can help tremendously.

Mystic (makes this card their bitch) -Having a high amount of cancels, deny existence (especially level 5), slow draw and quantum flux, this class is not in the least bit concerned by this card.

TLDR If your character can pull from the level 1 survivor pool or any cards from the mystic pool, they will likely be just fine. If they cannot, consider versatile for deny existence.

drjones87 · 206
Guardians actually have Delay the Inevitable, which is also very useful to help others who tend to draw more — Nenananas · 273
Patrice, while "can pull from the level 1 survivor pool or any cards from the mystic pool" will likely be one of the gators having a harder time to mitigate BtV. Yet, I think with Dr. Francis Morgan and Charisma pretty much everybody can handle that treachery quite at ease. It looks more scary, than it actually is. — Susumu · 383

Best way to prevent instant death :

: Orphic Theory (1xp)

: Delay the Inevitable (0xp)

: Alter Fate (1 or 3xp) or Devil's Luck (1xp)

: Deny Existence (0xp)

: nothing trivial, maybe Cheat Death (5xp)

Orphic Theory allows you to ignore the card text before it triggers. Use it within your investigation phase then draw the last cards of your deck. Beyond the Veil won't trigger, meaning it will stay in your threat area. But you're temporarily safe.

Delay the Inevitable can only be played during your turn so be cautious. Play it then draw the last cards so it will trigger immediately. Then your discard pile is shuffled into your deck during upkeep phase, before you have a chance to draw it again (and die instantly).

Alter Fate: same thing, use it during your turn then draw the last card(s). The 3 xp version won't cost an action. Devil's Luck is more efficient, but it will cost you 1 xp each time it is used if you want it back (unless you bought Déjà Vu).

Ayoross · 3
"Cheat Death" won't do much. It doesn't help, if you have to take two or more damage, than you could take onto your investigatorcard. There is a better option in the campaign for 0 XP, but you have to win scenarios for it: Dr. Francis Morgan, who can soak you 4. He in fact let me survive BtV as solo Agnes once in a run, when "Deny Existence" and "Alter Fate" where not yet printed. — Susumu · 383
Ah, indeed, I#ve overseen that: "Cheat Death" could indeed help, if you try to get defeated by other means before your deck runs out! Then you would discard BtV without triggering it. — Susumu · 383
You forgot Devil's Luck (1). — AlderSign · 435
@susumu : you are wrong about Cheat Death : You cannot overkill or be overkilled. Once you drop to zero, that's the sum total of the damage you will take. Cheat Death can be used to heal you back up to 2/2. — Ayoross · 3
You are wrong in that regard. See RR: Dealing Damage/Horror — Susumu · 383
When an investigator [...] is dealt damage and/or horror, follow these steps, in order: 1. Assign Damage/Horror: Determine the amount of damage and/or horror being dealt. Place damage and/or horror tokens equal to the amount of damage and horror being dealt next to the cards that will be taking the damage/horror. [...] All damage/horror that cannot be assigned to an asset must be assigned to the investigator. 2. Apply Damage/Horror: Any assigned damage/horror that has not been prevented is now placed on each card to which it has been assigned, simultaneously. [...] After applying damage/horror, if an investigator has damage equal to or higher than his or her health or horror equal to or higher than his or her sanity, he or she is defeated. — Susumu · 383
You would be right, that an asset cannot be "overkilled" (except by damage or horror that is dealt as specific direct to an asset, like there is with some treacheries targeting allies). That's because of a paragraph, I shortened in the last post: "An asset cannot be assigned damage beyond the amount of damage it would take to defeat the card, and cannot be assigned horror beyond the amount of horror it would take to defeat the card." But the investigator card will take any amount of damage or horror, like previously mentioned. And the case of being dealt "equal to or hight then..." is covered for investigators. — Susumu · 383
@Susumu: you forget a part of the text : « When an investigator is dealt damage, place damage on the investigator card and/or on any of that investigator’s asset cards that have health, up to the amount of damage each card can hold. » — Ayoross · 3
Besides: if you could not overkill an enemy, like you said, the basic weakness "Unspeakable Oath (Bloodthirst)" would be unsolvable. — Susumu · 383
Where do you have your quoted sentence from. But it does not contradict my take: Assets can only be dealt damage (or "hold") up to their health and sanity value, any excess has to be dealt to the investigator, who can "hold" unlimited damage or horror, but will be defeated, if it is equal or higher than the given stat. — Susumu · 383
@susumu: As I understand the rule : you get 10 damages, your investigator has 7 health. You assign 7 to your investigator, the rest on your assets, and some damage remains. You have still being dealt more damage than your life, but at the end there are only 7 tokens on your investigator card. Same for Unspeakable Oath. — Ayoross · 3
That's not like it is written: First, assigning damage to assets is entierly optional. Even if it defeats you, you can take it on the chin. (Which might be conveniant in cases, where it is very likely, that you get defeated by horror otherwise soon, and a physical trauma suits you better than a mental one.) But the RR mention, you first assign damage next to your cards, then apply it to your cards. And you apply all, which has not been prevented, no matter how much it had been. Since your assets are limited to their printed value, you have to assign and then apply all the rest on your investigator. — Susumu · 383
Well, the Learn to play manual (my quote) seems to say that you cannot assign more damage to a card than its health value, not only assets. The RR seems to say otherwise, all this is not very consistent. Actually, I see no reason your actual health could go negative, even skill checks cannot. And Cheat Death would be mostly useless. — Ayoross · 3
Have you noted this in RR : « if an asset has damage equal to or higher than its health » They use the same prophylactic wording. — Ayoross · 3
The Golden RUle includes: "If the text of this Rules Reference directly contradicts the text of the Learn to Play book, the text of the Rules Reference takes precedence." My take seems also to be the interpretation of others in the community. See the comment by SGPrometheus on a review for "St. Hubert's Key" by Snakesfighting 6 years ago, which has been agreed on by other people in the community: "That would be neat, but it doesn't quite work that way. Your flashlight analogy doesn't apply; horror doesn't reduce your sanity, you simply put "x" horror on your investigator. Then if your total is higher than your sanity, you're defeated. If you have this in play, you'd discard it, heal 2 horror, then if you still have more horror than sanity you're still defeated." — Susumu · 383
Susumu is definitely correct. Hank Samson getting overkilled has been a thing since he came out. The Learn to Play isn't a good source for official rules. — Eudaimonea · 6