Sacrificial Beast

This has been updated to match my "Signature Weakness Project." I have done my best to make sure that the original content isn't altered too much, out of respect for any comments.

Another Enemy weakness!. Looking at the two elements, the effect and the discard condition, we get:

The effect: Jenny likes resources; it's kind of her thing, and this weakness shuts resource generation beyond the means of the plebes right down. The 4 combat and 3 health make the Beast likely a 2 action roadblock, and a non-combat Jenny can struggle with it. It can be handled by other investigators, which is a plus, and it's not much of a challenge for your average Guardian (or even Miss Barnes under most circumstances). Like Searching for Izzie, a lot depends on when you draw it, although the situation is reversed for the Beast. Drawing it early will ruin your day for a bit and require addressing; drawing it late in the scenario often means you can just ignore it, and the size and shape of the map have a big effect on how easy it is to reach. Mitigating this card requires the usual range of combat options. Getting to the Beast's location involves the typical tools of Elusive and/or Elusive. Jenny could use some of her precious off-class slots on Vicious Blow (to try and take the enemy out in 1 action) or "Get over here!" to bring the Beast to her.

The discard condition: Get to it, and kill it.

All in all, this is an average signature weakness, maybe below Average in multiplayer with a strong monster hunter.

Box vs book Both assets can be replaced with faction cards and are merely good, not fantastic, while both weaknesses are pretty bad, with the Beast being slightly easier (especially in solo), so players might well chose the "book" set over the "box" set, and I doubt anyone will want to take both.

Green Man Medallion

Jenny likes spending XP (who doesn't?), and she is good at generating resources, so there is a good chance that she will pick up a decent "discount" every scenario where this gets played. Since it's a discount on one card as opposed to bonus XP, you will want to have a good idea of what you are intending to buy and, therefore, the maximum resources you want to stack on this in any given scenario. It does eat up a lot of resources, but Jenny is primed to provide them, and it's a fast action to charge the medallion, which makes it more playable. While Jenny's other signature asset takes up both coveted hand slots, it's not like doesn't have some good accessories. Additionally, if you are a gambler, Charon's Obol is probably a more efficient way to do much the same thing as the medallion, although there is no reason you can't run both for some ridiculous XP purchases.

Asset-wise, the two sets are pretty similar, while the "box" signature weakness is worse. Players who like Jenny might get the novel and try out the "book" set for a bit of relief. No one will want to play both, I think.

Jenny's Twin .45s

Really? No reviews after all these years? Well, let's compare to the .45 Automatic.

Pros:

  • +1
  • Same "1 resource = 1 ammo," but you can decide how much ammo you would like.

Cons:

  • The card fills both hand slots, which limits options, assuming Jenny doesn't want to use 1-2 of her precious "free" card slots on Bandolier.

The Con is pretty bad, since Jenny likes her hand slots (Lockpicks, anyone?). I suspect that the dream of pouring 10+ resources into this and never having to find another weapon is a bit of a trap, and the flexibility is more useful in the moment they are played, looking at the quantity and strength of the enemies available at that moment and deciding on expenditure based on that. However, I also suspect that there are other styles of play. Overall, this is a decent weapon, but not a fantastic one, and has a fair number of guns to meet all tastes, so Jenny can definitely get by without this. It's paired with a pretty bad weakness, so are the pistols worth the cost?

It's hard to compare the two signature assets, since they do such different things, but they seem at about the same level. For the signature weaknesses, the "box" is definitely worse than the "book," so the "book" signature set is probably a little kinder, and no one will want both.

An even closer comparison would be with Knife's second ability. This card could have been called 'Knives.' Pay X, get X knives, and your hands are full of them. (Yeah, you can't vanilla stab, but whatever. What rogue does stuff vanilla?) — Death by Chocolate · 1488
Now I want a Knives card.... — LivefromBenefitSt · 1083
Searching for Izzie

This has been updated to match my "Signature Weakness Project." I have done my best to make sure that the original content isn't altered too much, out of respect for any comments.

Another bad, trauma-inducing weakness. Looking at the two elements, the effect and the discard condition, we get:

The effect: This Weakness has many of the same issues as Roland's Cover Up, although Jenny has a greater capacity for mental trauma, so a bad draw at the end of a scenario isn't quite as deadly. On the other hand, while Jenny's Weakness can always be resolved if you can get to it (no clue shenanigans), it does appear on the furthest location, which can be very bad in large or unusually-shaped maps, plus it goes into her discard pile when resolved for extra drawing possibilities. Any investigator can trigger this, although the and an Investigate test is a tougher nut to crack and more vulnerable to a bad location choice. Missing the test on Searching for Izzie effectively costs you an extra turn. Searching for Izzy can cost Jenny 2 Trauma if she gets defeated while it is out, adding injury to more injury. Since it's attached to a location, if the scenario discards locations, the Weakness will also get discarded, so that's nice. There are not many specific mitigating strategies besides making sure someone can pass that Investigate test and movement boosts like Nimble or Elusive (and maybe "I'm outta here!" to get back to a Resign point).

The discard condition: Get to the location, spend two actions, and succeed on an Investigate test.

Taking everything together, this is a way above average signature weakness, being very action intensive and subject to timing. It might be a little easier in higher player counts. It can end a campaign.

Box vs book Between the two signature weaknesses, the "book" set has an advantage (especially in solo), while the assets are about the same, although they do pretty different things. Players might well prefer the "book" to the "box," and who would want both?

Can I Investigate - Searching for Izzie with a flashlight or lockpicks? — LTT · 1
No. You must take the actions on the card for its effect to take place (discarding it). — dscarpac · 1211
Grete Wagner

It makes me laugh that Roland Banks, the most straightforward investigator, has seen more and more weirdness appear in the guardian set. From knives and pistols In the basic box, you’ll now often see him with magical blades or flesh wards. One version of him involves Dr. Elli fishing for mystical artifacts. You wonder how he writes around having a mystical mirror on his special reports.

This is another thing he’s probably covering over with the trademark agency black highlighter: a mystical purifier. Of course.

For five resources, It’s an expensive pairing. But it’s an effective one. You can either investigate when enemies aren’t around with a solid degree of comfort. Staying in place while getting clues elsewhere is an extremely useful thing. And if you’re already running beat cops, and have some ally healing tools, it becomes even better.

For either one action or a fast exhaust of your beat cop, you can remove two clues from your weakness. Next turn, kill another rat or aloof foe and you’re out of the hole completely.

The German witch hunter helped you discover numerous clues from the rat swarm. Maybe that would stay off the official report.

MrGoldbee · 1484
Really, don’t make such a big deal of this! Roland just has to fill out a RRF-333(M) and get it signed by his immediate superior, the Section Chief, and the Regional Chaplin. No sweat! — LivefromBenefitSt · 1083
Regional Chaplin? I think there was only one Chaplin in the 20s... — MrGoldbee · 1484
Naw, the country was lousy with the little scamps. I blame autocorrect. — LivefromBenefitSt · 1083