Sure Gamble

I recently play a rogue with some XP devoted for treachery defense. He can simply not trying at all to boost and tank horror from willpower tests with Elder Sign Amulet (skips about 1-2 tests), or make it go away with cards like "You handle this one!" or Counterespionage. But there is a hole in this defense, if Frozen in Fear already lands there is not much I can do.

Frozen in Fear is an example that this card is a good answer. Like Lucky!, you get to keep this card intact on hand while you try the recurring test again and again, until you see an appropriate chaos tokens, then like its name you surely pass with 2 resources. Much better than going for a big willpower boost (e.g. Moxie pump / Say Your Prayers / Savant) only for the chaos bag to laugh at you with a bigger minus and lose all your investments. You just wait and not waste anything with Sure Gamble. For the sake of variety and same XP budget, rather than doubling up 2x Elder Sign Amulet for consistency only for it to be powerless against Frozen in Fear, 1x Elder Sign Amulet + 1x Sure Gamble maybe better.

The "Striking Fear" set is special that it is somehow used in most FINAL scenario of the campaign. I say this card is not so situational if there is this prominent pattern in campaign design. In the final scenario you either win or lose the campaign and many things in Striking Fear set are BS against Rogue, and it will be sad if your character is on their knee unable to play after such a long journey. I think even 3 XP for one of this card added last minute before the final showdown is a good investment. It is a core set card for good reason.

To make good use of XP, an over-success card with situational benefit like .41 Derringer (2) which now comes together in Revised Core Set can give it an another duty. Unlike Lucky! which only works when you fail, this card sometimes let you choose between regular success or over-success. (In the case if this gun it has 3 kinds of success.) Breaking and Entering (2), Slip Away (2), etc. also has multiple kinds of success.

5argon · 9610
Waylay

Wait people actually think this card is good? Its terrible.

Lets look at all the negatives.
-Costs 3, a card and an action.
-Have to do a test with no bonus.
-No refund if you fail the test.
-Non-elite only.
-Your location only.
-Enemy must be exhausted.

Just kill the enemy normally or evade an move away. This thing needs to do like 10 damage for it to be worthwhile (and again only affects non-elites).

fates · 51
I almost always put it in Rita, but later i swap it for Sweeping Kick unless we are playing some campaign known for big enemies. It is nice to defeat an enemy with 1 skill test basically and with your AGI — Blood&gore · 417
If it was a trick, which thematically it avbsolutely could have been, I would too see this in Rita. 3 resources is a big ask for her, though, for a card, that can't be payed with "Crafty". — Susumu · 362
I once took it to Dunwich and killed Broods of Yog-Sothoth with it :) best feeling ever — Pawiu14 · 184
If you look at all the negatives of a card without the positives, yeah, it's gonna look bad. This card still has the fairly unique space of being a way to defeat enemies with evasion, which even Kymani can't do. It's easy to say 'why not just kill the enemy', but some evaders are unable to do that. — SSW · 209
Considering the icons I think it is OK to be this situational, if you have enough agi to include this card, you can always perform regular evade also with the commit. That said I would not add this card unless an another player can sometimes evade too to help with action economy (agi 3+) so you don't have to exhaust it yourself. — 5argon · 9610
Try it in Finn with Anatomical diagrams. 4 resources and 1 action for 4-6 hp enemy is worth it. — ambiryan13 · 177
It's highly situational, but I think terrible is quite the overstatement. It's a level 0 card that can defeat an enemy (regardless of remaining health) with a single test, so of course it comes with steep requirements. — Pseudo Nymh · 54
Dig Deep

Am I crazy or is this the coterie agent? Were they planned from the start?

ThisisarealreviewThisisarealreviewThisisarealreviewThisisarealreviewThisisarealreviewThisisarealreviewThisisarealreviewThisisarealreviewThisisarealreviewThisisarealreviewThisisarealreviewThisisarealreviewThisisarealreviewThisisarealreviewThisisarealreviewThisisarealreviewThisisarealreviewThisisarealreviewThisisarealreviewThisisarealreviewThisisarealreviewThisisarealreview

Flopus · 22
It's someone wearing a fairly common style of hat for the time. You know, if you ever find yourself having to get around the character limit, it's probably a good indication that you should take the comment somewhere else rather than posting it here. — SSW · 209
Whatever this is, a review it definitely is not. Can we get this removed? It forces a horizontal scrollbar, and that's annoying. — TheNameWasTaken · 3
You are right: This is the infamous Lady with the Purple Red Striped Boar. Alas, we won't get a Return To box anymore, where she was supposed to be officially released. — Susumu · 362
This post broke the entire page for me. Get this shit ouf of here please. — prezeden · 4
Keen Eye

I completely disagree with Caius take on this card, Keen Eye is, without a doubt, the worst "Permanent: spend resources for stat boost" talent in the game by FAR. Not only it doesn't hold a candle against Scrapper, Streetwise and Higher Education (and the fact it's the only card out of these 4 not to get taboo should tell you a lot), but it's absolute ineffective on its own even without considering its class alternatives.

"Now why is that?" You may ask "Why is this card so bad? It gives a stat boost of +1 for and , two of the main game winning skills, for the rest of the turn for 2 resources, and you can even stack it if you have the cash"

And the end of that sentence is exactly the issue: Guardians do not have the cash for this kind of luxury, with possibly the exception of Zoey Samaras, Leo Anderson and Tommy Muldoon, they are constantly paying for assets, put allies in play, play events, they simply cannot afford the economy to leverage on the stat boost reliably. Nathaniel Cho can, given his playstyle is less asset heavy, but his is too low for the boost to matter, and his is high enough he doesn't need it

Second, +1 for 2 resources for all your skill checks in a round is a very bad deal in anything above easy, and very questionable on easy itself. By the time you can afford the exp for this permanent, the stat boost will probably not suffice for most skill checks you will have difficulties to complete. Sure you can spend 4 resources for a +2, but where you are gonna get enough money to do so?!

Third, and this is the reason what leaves Keen Eye completely dead in the water: boosting all of your skill checks in one turn by little is massively inneficent compared to boosting one skill check by a lot, because that means you are committing the rest of the round fighting and/or investigating. Most guardians aren't just gonna spend all of their actions investigating one location, even in multiplayer, they are very likely to want to take other actions in between, before or at the end of their turn, like moving to another location to investigate there. And even the most combat heavy guardian will struggle to do nothing but fight the whole round (unless you are playing a full 4 player game with heavy enemy spawning and high boss health), their turn will probably also be interspaced by moving and engaging. You sacrifice massive action flexibility to make use of this Permanent, which makes it very difficult to justify using. Sure the times it works (in location with lots of clues and enemies) can be pretty good, but remember you are spending 3 exp for a highly situational permanent and possibly adding to your deck and buying various economy cards just to make use of this

I cannot understate, for a 3 exp card, how bad Keen Eye is, it's almost worthless on its own and ridicolously situational if you have the economy for it. Ironically, if this was the Rogue permanent talent instead of Streetwise... It would still be absolute rubbish, but at least would fit a niche because rogues have various ways to grant themselves additional actions to make the most of the buff

I agree, I tried to make this card work but it felt very clunky for a Permanent that is supposed to make you feel not clunky... sure it does not take my deck space even if I don't use it but I want my 3 XP back. If it boosts all stats by +1 AND lasts for a round instead of phase it would have application in mythos cancelling, some use with flex Guardian who do different things in a turn, or attacks that adds up different stats. This card's text is just handicapped on all sides. — 5argon · 9610
The only time I used this if for a Lily Chen deck that run out of stuff top upgrade, and even then I got more use of Soul Sanctification than Keen Eye — HeroesOfTomorrow · 49
Ha! Lily Chen was also my deck which I tried to make this work. (Int Discipline + Butterfly Sword) — 5argon · 9610
Strange to start a review talking about how poor guardians are and end the review showing how guardians have received tons of resource generation over time. you can easily play a guardian who has one melee beat stick and then never spend another resource on anything important, for 3xp keen eye allows such a deck to spend a turn or two being a clue gatherer, the thing the class struggle with the most, what other XP guardian clue gathering card is anywhere close to that reliable? — Zerogrim · 292
Evidence or Gerte, Scene, Runic Axe, Field Agent, Breach the Door... — MrGoldbee · 1443
Field agent and Grete are both expensive, require drawing and playing them, why not spend all those resources getting +2/3 on keen eye and doing 3 investigates? Breach isn't XP, evidence 1 is close to useless and runic axe is one of the strongest guardian cards in the game. — Zerogrim · 292
"[B]oosting all of your skill checks in one turn by little is massively inneficent compared to boosting one skill check by a lot, because that means you are committing the rest of the round fighting and/or investigating": I don't really get that, because that's what you normally would do with this card anyway. A guardian should be able to smash a minion in one action, committing a card or two, without boosts. But what about bosses, who require more actions and have a fight value of 5? In this case, a "Keen Eye" can surely help efficiently. And if you can't deal with a minion, because your hand is empty, but have some resources to spare, you gladly take the ineficient push to do what is needed. Caius' review is also 5 years old. There had been released alternatives, which might replace "Keen Eye" nowadays, none with the permanent keyword, though. So his point still kind of apply. Sure, the other permanents (that spend resources) are better, they had been chained for a reason. But this does not make "Keen Eye" unplayable. It's a matter of having the 3 XP for it or not. — Susumu · 362
@Zerogrim, Have you noticed all the options for resource genration but 3 I mentioned (one that is not that good either) are locked behind exp? My issue with Keen Eye is that you also need the economy to play that consistently to justify the use, and if you do not you are gimping yourself from playing a weapon or other useful assets. Also I find it funny you are saying Grete and Field Agent are too expensive when using Keen Eye Twice costs the same amount of resources as agent and 1 less for Grete for a not semi-permanent stat boost, and both are far easier to play through stuff like calling in favour and motivational speech. Literally the only thing Keen Eye has over them is, as you mentioned, being there at the start of every scenario, but it is still not a good option. Getting Grete to level 3 and buying Well-prepared is literally a better Lore boost then Keen eye ever will be. Also, playing with one weapon and relaying on Prepared for the worst to cut down the cost of your deck, is asking you to get punished by the rng through Crypt Chill or having the weapon be shuffle on the bottom on your deck. — HeroesOfTomorrow · 49
@susumu I literally mentioned bosses as one of the situations where Keen Eye might be decent, especially in high player counts given their higher health values. But I refuse to believe, even 5 years ago, there weren't many better cards to spend your exp on than Keen Eye. It was garbo in the past and it's only getting worse with time — HeroesOfTomorrow · 49
And you know what, I will go as far to say the whole appeal of being "permanent" is completely pointless, because the whole advantage of a permanent card is the static boost, the fact you can use it and relay on it any time. Nobody is using Keen Eye turn one, you are asking to cripple your economy otherwise, you first gonna explore, prepare your play area with key assets, take care of easy foes, maybe play the economy cards I mentioned to help you use Keen Eye and other cards... In other worse by the point you actually would use Keen Eye, you are likely to already have drawn a non-permanent card that helps you fighting and investigating anyway. In the meant time, you can throw one or 2 resources in Scrapper and Higher Education to help you with a hard check, and Rogues can generate cash easily to justify the cost of Streetwise early too if the draw the right hand — HeroesOfTomorrow · 49
if you only consider Field Agent and Grete resource cost then yea they are better than keen eye, you also have to consider their cost to be drawn, cost to be played, the fact they take up a slot both in play and in your deck, sure with combo's they are way better than keen eye, but run tommy with the star and keen eye and laugh at who trivial 6 or more resources is to be spent. — Zerogrim · 292
@Zerogrim I literally did mention in my review that Tommy is one of the few investigators that can actually make Keen Eye because guy gets Assets refunded regularly. And as I said, I'm not convinced of the argument of Keen Eye's cost being even out by the fact it's already in play and ready to use specifically because when you use it, you need to spend your entire turn fighting/investigating to justify the expense. By the time you may want to use it, you may already have drawn a strenght/intellect booster. The way I see it a Keen Eye you are buying is a charisma you are not getting, which is significantly better for people like Tommy and Leo — HeroesOfTomorrow · 49
I think by the time you consider taking this, you've already injected a bunch of economy into your deck with stuff like stick to the plan, ever vigilant, I've had worse, etc. Sure, a 0 XP guardian doesn't have the money for this, but there's a lot of campaigns where I end up considering this. — Blackhaven · 3
Also there's definitely more value in Permanents that just the consistency. They basically save you a card, an action, and however many resources it would cost it if wasn't Permanent. — Blackhaven · 3
Ceremonial Sickle

Unless you have some kind of huge rube goldberg combo costing a million XP, this thing is a giant trap.

On one hand, a 3 cost weapon that can get you +4 to hit is great. Where the problem starts is that it only deals 2 damage and exhausts itself. 2 damage is not enough. There are somewhere around 100 enemies in the game with 2 or fewer health, and that number includes swarms and bosses that get +X per investigator health that I can't be bothered to count, because there are around 250 enemies in the game with 3 or more health.

An investigator dedicated to fighting needs to be able to deal at least 3 damage per round, full stop.

The best case scenario for the sickle is to deal 2 damage, evade the enemy, then finish it off next round with the secondary ability to clear the doom. For four xp you're doing in three actions, with three tests, across two rounds, what any other weapon/spell could do in 2 or less. All that 4xp gets you is an unnecessarily huge bonus on the first of your three tests, and it still requires outside boosts to seal the deal.

There are two cards that make the sickle work, and they're both expensive. The first is Elle Rubash, who makes sitting on the doom while you wait for the second attack less dangerous, and gives a small but appreciated bonus to make the secondary attack actually connect. If you dual-wield them you even have a relatively stable combo... for a bank-breaking 10xp minimum. The elephant in the room is that, if you're running Elle, Abyssal Tome does what the sickle does at half the cost. It lacks the extra boost for the first attack, but makes up for it with the ability to boost the damage output when you really need to. Unlike the sickle, it is appropriately costed for the limitations involved.

The second option is to spend a whopping six more xp on Sin-Eater. Sin Eater lets you double tap the sickle in a given turn, and gives an option to clear doom that doesn't involve using the terrible secondary ability. It's pretty good, as should be expected for a 10xp combo... ignoring the caveat that you can't use it at all in the last three rounds of any agenda. I wouldn't spend 10xp on a combo that still regularly requires a Moonlight Ritual, but you do you I guess.

The sickle is just worse in every way that matters compared to the Enchanted Blade, a card which already doesn't get much play because it's not a spell. It is laughably worse than every other 4xp weapon or spell. The only investigator in the game that would want to take the sickle over something else can't, because it's 4xp. You could argue it's less useful than a Kukri, a level 0 weapon which is cheaper, more flexible, and doesn't add doom to the field, and kukri is the worst card in the game.

CombStranger · 263
I think you missed the fact that you still can trigger abilities on cards that are exhausted. So you can do 3 damage in 2 actions, not 3 across two rounds. Despite that, I still agree that this is definitely overcosted XP wise. — Nenananas · 251
Huh, you're right, this whole doom trio is missing the "If X is ready..." clause. Exhausting technically doesn't even do anything unless "exhaust X to get" is interpreted as an additional cost, which is otherwise always explicitly written as "as an additional cost to activate this ability,". I'm kind of surprised that hasn't been errata'd. — CombStranger · 263